2. Why is the word “judge” an inaccurate label for the leaders of pre-monarchial Israel?
The Book of Judges a book of the Bible originally written in Hebrew. It appears in the Tanakh and in the Christian Old testament. Its title refers to its contents; it contains the history of Biblical judges, who helped rule and guide the ancient Israelites, and of their times.
As Judges stands today, the last judge it mentions is Samson, and although there are two further stories, the traditional view is that Samson’s exploits probably synchronise with the period immediately preceding Eli, who was both high priest and judge. Both academic views and traditional thought hence view the narrative of the judges as ending at Samson, picking up again at 1 Samuel 1:1 to consider Eli, and continuing through to 1 Samuel 7:2. As for the stories at the end of the Book, which are set in the same time period as the judges, but discuss people other than the judges, there is much affinity between these and the Book of Ruth, and many people believe Ruth originally belonged amongst them.
Judges in the Old Testmanent era are the one called by God to save or deliver the Israelites from danger or from the enemy. As I understood with the questions and my readings. The word “judge” is an inaccurate label for the leaders of pre-monarchial Israel because the judges during that time is also disobeyed some regulations or some commands of God. Supposed to be, as a leader of the Israelites, and as a leader commanded by God, they must follow all God’s instruction, but some of the leader are disobeyed God in some area. So I think that is the reason why the word judge is an inaccurate for the leader of the pre-monarchial Israel.





